Jackson’s
Optimise USP Section on the Home Page
A/B/C/D Test
What the Data Told Us
Hypothesis
What We Wanted to Achieve
Variant Structures
How Each Layout Was Set Up
Why Multiple Variants
Our Rationale for Each Approach
The Results
After two weeks, the test results demonstrated that Variant 1 consistently outperformed other variants across mobile and desktop platforms, showcasing significant increases in key metrics such as 225% increase in Conversion Rate and 66% increase in Average Purchase Revenue per User overall. This variant also drove higher engagement with an 88% increase in Average Products per Visitor and a 56% uplift in clicks on the Add to Cart. While Variant 2 showed competitive results in revenue performance for desktop users (an increase of 251%), its overall impact was less robust than Variant 1. Variant 3 underperformed in several critical areas, with revenue and PDP visit declining, making it less favourable for implementation.
Variant 1 demonstrated the best performance across almost all desktop, mobile, and overall metrics.
We implemented Variant 1 permanently.
-
225%
Increase in Conversion Rate -
66%
Increase in Average Purchase Revenue per User -
88%
Increase in Average Products Purchased per Visitor
See More A/B Tests
-
Search & NavigationUtilising Story Widgets
Does redesigning category navigation with clearer, circular icons improve mobile conversions and subscription revenue?
-
Collection Page (PLP)Utilising Sub-Category Widgets
Will adding sub-category widgets on a collection page increase overall revenue?
-
Product Page (PDP)Sticky Add to Cart vs. Subscribe & Save
Does making PDP CTAs sticky improve conversions, and which option works better: Add to Cart or Subscribe & Save?